Can large
organizations be successful with a BSC? Yes. Absolutely. I've seen success at
complex organizations that employ tens of thousands of people. But large
organizations, even more so than others, must remember to continually go back
to five basic building blocks that make a Balanced Scorecard (BSC) framework
successful.
- Executive Engagement
- Focus
- Support
- Alignment
- Sustained Results
Regardless if
your organization is just starting or has traveled far down its strategy
execution journey, if you don’t have all five of these building blocks, your
BSC framework will come to a grinding halt. The true measure of success, of
course, is contained within that fifth building block, SUSTAINED RESULTS.
This is both a building block (you need to show results to maintain momentum)
and a measure of the entire framework's effectiveness. Here is what you
should look for in each building block:
Executive
Engagement
At a large
organization, it's hard work to bring senior leadership together on a
consistent basis to look at their scorecard. However, success won't be
built on getting senior leadership to attend the kickoff meeting, to know how
to view their scorecard, or even to attend regular scorecard reviews. You need
their engagement. They need to role model the behavior they expect from
their direct reports, to communicate to measure and initiative owners just how
important their input to the BSC is, and to actively participate during
scorecard reviews to keep measure and initiative owners from escaping
accountability and progress.
Focus
At a large
organization, complexity rules. Over time, you'll witness the tendency
for scorecards to get overwhelmed with objectives and measures. This
"slippage" lets people revert back to pre-BSC days of non-prioritized
fire fighting. It's okay to add a new objective or initiative when it's
appropriately aligned and urgent, but your organization does not have limitless
access to people and money. As an "internal consultant" on your
BSC, you have to manage this tendency to pile on more objectives, measures, and
initiatives after the initial scorecards are built. Without focus, your
organization will try to focus on too much at once and in the end get very
little accomplished.
Support
For a BSC
to work -- especially in a large organization -- balanced scorecards must be
kept up-to-date and reviewed thoroughly and regularly. This requires a certain
amount of support, especially in the areas of prepping for scorecard reviews,
delivering scorecard software training, managing scorecard content
restructuring, data loading, and leadership direction. Here are some questions
that commonly "bubble up" in a large BSC deployment, highlighting how
important a support structure is:
- How do I train my team on the Balanced Scorecard
approach?
- Where can my team obtain scorecard review coaching?
- What happens to my scorecards if there’s a reorg?
- Where can I get a new hire trained on our scorecard
software?
- How do we share best practices across the scorecard
teams?
- How can I make preparation for scorecard reviews more
efficient?
- What does management want to see in my status updates?
- Who will tell me if the scorecard software
functionality changes?
Being able to answer all of
these questions (and more) will lead to a much smoother roll-out of Balanced
Scorecards across a large enterprise.
Alignment
There are
lots of important aspects of alignment in a BSC deployment, but in this case
I'm specifically speaking about initiative alignment -- ensuring your
improvement efforts are aligned to the priorities you've identified through
your BSC cascading process. Certainly you may see a temporary lift in
performance by simply bringing executives together and discussing what the
organization should focus on as well as what the targets should be. However,
true sustained results come when you align an initiative to an under-performing
measure on a scorecard, then track progress of the initiative and watch for the
impact on the measure. Don’t wait too long before updating management on the
status of initiatives that will impact measures on their BSCs. By highlighting
progress on aligned initiatives during scorecard reviews, they will have a
greater chance of getting completed on time because you will have brought
together the individuals with the authority to make decisions on priorities and
budget. When initiatives get DONE, measures improve. If measures don’t
change after an initiative is complete, then you’ll need root cause analysis to
pick a new, more focused, better aligned initiative.
Sustained
Results
This last
building block is sort of self-fulfilling. If a BSC is not creating sustained
results, which is the promise and the purpose of a BSC, senior leadership
support will wither and their engagement is the lifeblood of the BSC. If it
does show results, the framework will be praised and its importance will become
ingrained. So what do those results look like? It’s okay, in fact desirable, to
see red stoplight indicators on the top level scorecard. This shows me that the
executive team isn’t letting their direct reports “low ball” their targets.
What they need to see is that the line graphs on their top level measures are
moving CONSISTENTLY in the right direction. And for those lines that are
not moving in the right direction, they are confident that the owners of those
measures know the leading measures of performance and have initiatives that
will move results that are on time and on budget. Not only will this keep the
executives engaged, but it will create sustainable momentum throughout the
organization.
Comments